Processing math: 100%

Daniel Halpern-Leistner

Algebraic Geometry, Derived Categories, Representation Theory, Mathematical Physics

monodromy

About me

Email: daniel dot hl at cornell dot edu

CV (last updated July 2020)

I am currently an assistant professor at Cornell University. Previously I was an NSF/Ritt Post Doc at Columbia University and a member in mathematics at the Institute for Advanced Study. I completed my PhD at UC Berkeley. In my undergraduate studies at Princeton University, I focused on math and physics.

My primary research focuses on a cluster of related projects and ideas which I have labeled "beyond geometric invariant theory." Geometric invariant theory (GIT) is a well-studied and successful tool for constructing moduli spaces in algebraic geometry. But it does more than that. It is a framework for understanding the (equivariant) geometry of algebraic varieties with a reductive group action. The "beyond GIT" project attempts to expand geometric invariant theory in two ways: 1) to use the ideas of GIT to understand the structure of derived categories of equivariant coherent sheaves, which in turn leads to new results in classical equivariant topology and geometry, and 2) to expand the methods of GIT to apply to general moduli problems.

Dan H-L

Fall 2020: no teaching

Graduate advising

I typically run a graduate research seminar, which is open to all interested students and post docs.

I am currently accepting graduate advisees. If you are interested in working with me as your PhD advisor, please read my advising philosophy, which sets mutual expectations.

Articles

  • Towards a general theory of instability in moduli theory
  • updated 6/18/2021

A common kind of problem in algebraic geometry is to find a space, called a moduli space, parameterizing isomorphism classes of some kind of algebro-geometric objects -- let's call them widgets. Many attempts to form a moduli space for widgets proceed by finding a scheme, X, which parameterizes a family of widgets, and an algebraic group, G, acting on X such that points in the same orbit under G parameterize isomorphic widgets. Then hopefully one can apply geometric invariant theory to find an open subset in X which has a good quotient under the action of G, and whose G-orbits classify ``semistable'' widgets. However, there are many situations where a stability condition can be specified on widgets without referring to any GIT problem. We discuss a framework for defining a notion of semistability for an arbitrary moduli problem, and we introduce a structure on the unstable locus, which we call a Theta-stratification, which generalizes classical stratifications of the unstable locus in GIT as well as of the moduli of vector bundles on a curve. We identify a class of moduli problems, which we call Θ-reductive, for which the GIT story carries over nicely into this more general framework -- for these stacks the existence of a Θ-stratification on the unstable locus can be reduced to checking a relatively simple hypothesis.

  • "On the structure of instability in moduli theory," (arXiv)
  • Updated version here. (Last update 2/2/2022)
  • Derived Θ-stratifications and the D-equivalence conjecture
  • update 6/18/21
  • On properness of K-moduli spaces and optimal degenerations of Fano varieties
  • update 11/03/20
  • Learning selection strategies in Buchberger's algorithm
  • update 8/17/2020
  • Reductivity of the automorphism group of K-polystable Fano varieties
  • update 7/28/2020
  • Mapping stacks and the notion of properness in algebraic geometry
  • update 7/29/2019
  • Cartan-Iwahori-Matsumoto decompositions for reductive groups
  • update 3/1/2019
  • Existence of moduli spaces for algebraic stacks
  • updated 5/6/2019
  • Towards a general theory of instability in moduli theory
  • updated 7/10/2018
  • A categorification of the Atiyah-Bott localization formula
  • update 5/20/17
  • The equivariant Verlinde formula on the moduli of Higgs bundles
  • update 8/4/2016
  • Theta-stratifications, Theta-reductive stacks, and applications
  • update 6/12/2016
  • Combinatorial constructions of derived equivalences
  • update 2/26/2016
  • Tannaka duality revisited
  • update 7/05/15
  • Equivariant Hodge theory and noncommutative geometry
  • update 7/03/15
  • Autoequivalences of derived categories and variation of GIT quotient
  • update 3/2013
  • The derived category of a GIT quotient
  • update 8/2012
  • The Lefschetz hyperplane theorem for Deligne-Mumford stacks
  • update 2012

My PhD thesis included chapters that became the papers "The derived category of a GIT quotient," "Autoequivalences of derived categories and variation of GIT quotient," and "On the structure of instability in moduli theory."

As an undergraduate I thought about algebraic approaches to information theory. Here is a primer on my undergraduate work (Last update 4/30/08)

Talks and expository papers on Beyond GIT

During the Spring 2020 term, I taught a graduate topics course on "Modern moduli theory," I have reformatted them into web-based book:

The Moduli Space

We surveyed the theory of algebraic stacks (fibered categories and descent, quasi-coherent sheaves, quotient stacks, deformation theory, and Artin's criteria, Tannaka duality), then discussed more recent advances (the etale local structure theorems of Alper, Hall, and Rydh, and the results of beyond GIT), and applied these methods to the moduli of vector bundles and principal G bundles over a smooth curve.

Here are some additional expository accounts of my research:

  • Notes from lectures on Theta-stability and existence of good moduli spaces, with applications to Donaldson invariants (Thun, Switzerland, 2017). Lecture 1, Lecture 2
  • A colloquium-style slide talk on applications of beyond GIT to the D-equivalence conjecture.
  • I have written a proceedings paper for the AMS summer algbraic geometry institute (SLC, 2015). Video of the lecture is available here.
  • Video of short member lecture at IAS
  • Brief Oberwolfach report.
  • Notes from a workshop on new methods in GIT (Berlin, 2015)

Beyond geometric invariant theory concept map

One of the great challenges of research mathematics is effectively communicating mathematical ideas. I'm experimenting with a concept map describing the "beyond GIT" project (click to interact). Last updated 2016.

Cohomologically proper algebraic stacks:

The notion of a proper (i.e. "compact") algebraic variety is essential to algebraic geometry. In the context of stacks, we argue that the standard notion of a proper algebraic stack is too restrictive, and we provide an alternative notion of cohomological properness: the stack should satisfy the 'Grothendieck existence' theorem "universally" (i.e. after arbitrary base change to a complete Noetherian ring, or more generally a stack which is complete along a closed substack). The Grothendieck existence theorem is usually regarded as a theorem, but taking it as the definition of properness leads to a notion which is well-behaved and generalizes the more geometric definition of properness in Champs algébriques in useful ways.

Relevant papers:

Equivariant Hodge theory:

For any dg-category, there is a spectral sequence starting with the Hochschild homology and converging to the periodic cyclic homology. When the category is Perf(X) for a scheme, this can be identified with the classical Hodge-to-deRham spectral sequence, and it degenerates when X is smooth and proper. The non-commutative HdR sequence degenerates for many cohomologically proper smooth stacks and fails to do so for many smooth stacks which are not cohomologically proper. This provides further evidence that cohomologically proper is a good generalization of the notion of properness to Artin stacks.

Another interesting aspect of this degeneration is that it allows one to construct a canonical pure Hodge structure on the topological K-theory of many smooth and cohomologically proper stacks. It raises the question of whether there is a canonical mixed Hodge structure on the topological K-theory of an arbitrary stack, and whether there is a motivic framework which is well-suited for stacks.

Relevant paper:

Mapping stacks:

If X and Y are stacks, then one can form a mapping stack, Map(X,Y), which by definition is the moduli functor parameterizing families of maps from X to Y. When X and Y are algebraic spaces (locally finitely presented over a Noetherian base) and X is proper and flat, then it is a classical result that Map(X,Y) is in fact represented by an algebraic space. When X is an algebraic stack, this mapping stack will again be an algebraic stack, as long as Y is geometric and X is cohomologically proper. The special case where X=Θ is central to the theory of Θ-stratifications.

Relevant papers:

Theta stratifications:

If X is a symplectic manifold admitting a Hamiltonian action by a compact group, K, then one has a K-equivariant stratification of X by the gradient descent flow of the norm-squared of the moment map. When X is a projective variety, then this stratification has an alternative, purely algebraic, description in terms of the Hilbert-Mumford numerical criterion in GIT, and one can think of this as a stratification of the algebraic stack X=X/KC. Theta stratifications provide a generalization of this to stacks which are not global quotients stacks, such as the non finite-type stacks appearing in many moduli problems. The theory provides a framework for studying "stability" of algebro geometric objects generalizing GIT and many other commonly studied notions of stability.

Key idea: the strata have canonical modular interpretations -- they parameterize maps f:C/CX which exhibit "optimally destabilizing" data for the unstable point f(1)X.

Relevant papers:

Θ-reductive stack:

Given an algebraic stack representing a certain moduli problem, one can ask what data is required to define a Theta-stratification. For Θ-reductive stacks, all one needs is a class in H2(X;Q) and H4(X;Q) satisfying a "boundedness" hypothesis.

Simplest example: X/G, where X is affine and G is a reductive group

Non-example: X/G where X is projective and G is reductive

Interesting examples: Moduli of objects in the heart of a t-structure on the derived category of coherent sheaves of a projective variety

Formal definition: the map of "evaluation at 1" Map(C/C,X)X should be proper on connected components

Our research suggests that a good starting point for analyzing a moduli problem is to find a Θ-reductive enlargement of that moduli problem, then apply the theory of Θ-stability.

Relevant papers:

Generalized buildings:

A key construction in the theory of Theta-stability assigns to any point in an algebraic stack pX, a topological space D(X,p), called the degeneration space. A map C/CX along with an isomorphism f(1)p determines a point of D(X,p), and points of this form are dense in D(X,p).

When X=BG for a semisimple group G, then D(X,p) is homeromorphic to the spherical building of G, and when X=X/T for a normal toric variety X, the degeneration space of a generic point of X is homeomorphic to (|Σ|{0})/R×0, where |Σ| denotes the support of the fan defining X. Thus these degeneration spaces can be thought of as "generalized buildings," and they connect the theory of buildings in representation theory with toric geometry.

Relevant papers:

Extensions of Kirwan surjectivity:

Kirwan surjectivity states that for a GIT quotient of a smooth variety, Xss/GX/G, the restriction map on cohomology H(X/G)H(Xss/G) is surjective. The main structure theorem for derived categories leads to two extensions of this theorem:

  1. It provides a "categorification" of this result to a statement about derived categories of coherent sheaves. The restriction functor DbCoh(X/G)DbCoh(Xss/G) is always surjective on the level of objects, so that's not the right categorification. But it turns out there is a subcategory GwDbCoh(X/G) such that the restriction functor gives an equivalence GwDbCoh(Xss/G). This implies that the restriction functor admits a section DbCoh(Xss/G)DbCoh(X/G), and so for any invariant which can be extracted from the derived category, the restriction functor from X/G to Xss/G is surjective. For instance, you get Kirwan surjectivity for higher algebraic K-theory.

  2. It turns out that this categorical form of Kirwan surjectivity continues to hold (under certain hypotheses) for the category DbCoh when X is quasi-smooth; either a local complete intersection or a space with quasi-smooth derived structure. Combined with the de-categorification results extracting topological invariants from derived categories, this leads to a version of Kirwan surjectivity for equivariant Borel-Moore homology (again assuming certain hypotheses on the first homology of the cotangent complex of X)

Relevant papers:

Topological invariants of derived categories:

A result of Feigin and Tsygan holds that the cohomology of (the analytification of) an affine variety, X, over C is isomorphic to the periodic-cyclic homology of the coordinate ring. This agrees with the periodic-cyclic homology of the category of perfect complexes on X, so some topological information can be extracted directly from the derived category. For equivariant categories, Thomason showed that the topological equivariant K-theory modulo a prime power can be recovered from the derived category of equivariant coherent sheaves. It turns out that the equivariant K-theory itself can be recovered from the derived category of equivariant coherent sheaves, at least when X is smooth. This result allows one to de-categorify categorical Kirwan surjectivity and recover classical Kirwan surjectivity. When X is singular, one can recover the ``equivariant Borel-Moore K-theory from the derived category of coherent sheaves this leads to new versions of Kirwan surjectivity in Borel-Moore homology.

Relevant papers:

Virtual non-abelian localization theorem:

When X is a compact manifold and T is a torus acting on X, localization theorems in equivariant cohomology provide a method for reducing the integrals of equivariant cohomology classes on X to integrals over the fixed locus XT (which could be just a sum over a finite set of points). There is another, closely related, flavor of localization theorems for stacks with a Θ-stratification. The integral Xω is replaced by the K-theoretic integral χ(X/G,F):=Σ(1)pdimRpΓ(X,F)G, where FPerf(X/G), and the localization formula expresses χ(X/G) as a sum of χ(Xss/G,F) and "correction terms" coming from each stratum. In some cases the correction terms vanish, leading to an identification between the integral over X and over Xss, and in other cases Xss=, leading to an formula for χ(X/G,F) in terms of the fixed locus as in the cohomological version. Thus the K-theoretic localization theorem is a little more flexible and has the advantage of working for non-abelian G, and the cohomological localization formula can be recovered for classes of the form ch(F).

For smooth global quotient stacks, the non-abelian localization theorem was developed by Teleman and Woodward. In fact the non-abelian localization formula is intrinsic to any stack with Θ-stratification, and does not require a local quotient description. Furthermore, using a little bit of derived algebraic geometry, we extend the non-abelian localization theorem to stacks which are quasi-smooth. If XclX is the underlying classical stack of a quasi-smooth stack X, and FPerf(X), then the virtual non-abelian localization theorem is a formula for χ(Xcl,FOvirX), where OvirXPerf(Xcl) is the "virtual" structure sheaf. (In practice most classical stacks with a perfect obstruction theory are the underlying classical stack of a quasi-smooth derived stack.)

Relevant papers:

Structure theorems for equivariant derived categories:

The main structure theorem for stacks with a Θ-stratification concerns the derived category of coherent sheaves. A semi-orthogonal decomposition of a pre-triangulated dg-category consists of the data of a collection of pre-triangulated (i.e. stable) subcategories which are semiorthogonal to one another (Homs only go in one direction with respect to some total ordering of the categories), and such that every object has a functorial filtration whose associated graded pieces lie in these subcategories. The main structure theorem states that when X is a (derived) stack with a Θ-stratification, then DCoh(X) admits a semiorthogonal decomposition where one piece, GwDCoh(X), is identified with DCoh(Xss) via the restriction functor. As a consequence, objects in DCoh(Xss) can be lifted functorially to DCoh(X). The other pieces of the semiorthogonal decomposition consist of objects which are set-theoretically supported on the unstable locus in X. There are certain situations in which this structure theorem is even stronger:

  1. When X is smooth, this semiorthogonal decomposition induces a decomposition on Perf(X), and
  2. When X is quasi-smooth but the coherent sheaf H1(TX) satisfies a certain weight condition, then this induces a semiorthogonal decomposition of DbCoh(X). The condition holds automatically for algebraic-symplectic stacks.
Relevant papers:

Monodromy representations on derived categories:

Let V be a quasi-symmetric linear representation of a reductive group G. The magic windows theorem gives more than derived equivalences between different GIT quotients of V. There are different choices of magic windows that one can use to construct derived equivalences between the different GIT quotients, one can use these different equivalences to construct an action of the fundamental groupoid of the ``complexified Kaehler moduli space." This space admits an explicit combinatorial description as the complement of a certain hyperplane arrangement in a torus, based on the character of V. Under homological mirror symmetry, this action of the fundamental groupoid on the derived category is conjectured to be mirror to an action by symplectic parallel transport on the mirror family of varieties. Thus we refer to it as a monodromy representation, even though its relationship with monodromy is still conjectural, for the moment.

Equivariant Verlinde formula on the moduli of Higgs bundles:

The Verlinde formula expresses the dimension of spaces of "generalized Theta-functions," defined as sections of a certain line bundle on the moduli of semistable G-bundles on a smooth curve. One consequence of the virtual localization formula is a proof of a version of this formula for the moduli of semistable Higgs bundles. Building on previous work of Teleman and Teleman-Woodward, one can compute the dimension of the space of sections of this line bundle (of any given weight under the Gm-action which scales the Higgs field) on the stack of all Higgs bundles, and our methods allow one to identify this with the corresponding space of sections of this line bundle on the space of semistable Higgs bundles.

Relevant paper:

Categorical representations of Yangians:

This is still work in progress with Davesh Maulik and Andrei Okounkov. We are using the magic windows theorem to categorify some earlier work of theirs on the quantum cohomology and quantum K-theory of Nakajima quiver varieties.

Derived equivalences and variation of GIT quotient:

The main application of the structure theorem is to proving cases of the ``K-equivalence implies D-equivalence" conjecture for K-equivalences arising from variation of GIT quotient: as the stability parameter for the GIT quotient changes, XssXss+, the stratification changes and thus the subcategories G±wDbCoh(X/G) differ. In nice situations, the category corresponding to one GIT quotient contains the category corresponding to the other GIT quotient, GwG+w. Using the full structure theorem, one can identify the semiorthogonal complement of Gw in G+w explicitly.

This model for how to construct derived equivalences is due to Ed Segal and to Hori, Herbst, and Page, who discovered the phenomenon in some basic examples. Ballard,Favero, and Katzarkov and I independently extended these methods to construct derived equivalences for all VGIT wall crossings which are "balanced" and satisfy a "Calabi-Yau" condition. The current state of the art on this method is the "magic windows theorem," which identifies subcategories of Db(V/G) which are identified with every GIT quotient for which Vss=Vs, when V is a ``quasi-symmetric" linear representation of a reductive group G satisfying a mild technical condition.

Relevant papers: