Get it now @ NECX
   
| < | Health & Fitness | < < | | Travel
<

Explore More:
Rate it!
Nokia 5180
in Cell Phones
(1=worst, 5=best)
Sound quality
15
Sexiness
15
Battery Life
15
Cost / Benefit
15

  • Compare it to others
  • User Reviews
  • Add this rating
       to your own Web site
     
  • top rated
    Cell Phones
    1. Nokia 6190
    2. Samsung SCH-3500
    3. NeoPoint 1000
    4. Mitsubishi G75
    5. Mitsubishi T200
  • See the full list...
  • My
    Get more out of : Register to easily manage your discussions and communities, and improve your searches. Plus, get email alerts about new posts in your favorite discussions with Tracker!
     
        discussions      
       Help | Feedback
    Previous in Search Next in Search
       >> Forum: comp.text.pdf
          >> Thread: Acrobat Reader 4.0 worse than 3.0?
            >> Message 6 of 7
     
    Subject:Re: Acrobat Reader 4.0 worse than 3.0?
    Date:1999/05/03
    Author:Louis Vosloo <support@YandY.com>
      Posting History

    Alex Delaware wrote:
     
    > In other words, this is a major bug in Acrobat 4, which they did not
    > catch prior to release, because, quite obviously, they rushed the
    > product. This common enough. The question is, what is Adobe going to
     
    The problem occurs only with fonts that have relatively large characters --- as a math extension font is likely to have.  Hence it affects mostly only the microscopic fraction of Adobe's clients using TeX (and many of those "clients" only use the free part of Acrobat from Adobe anyway).
     
    Some part of the Acrobat Reader printer driver for non-PS printers clips coordinates at 1024.  Now there is a claim somewhere that coordinates in glyphs should not get larger than this, but no other font rasterizer has ever had a problem with coordinates up to 4096 at least --- other than the buggy clone Sun's NEWS interpreter.  In the case of the NEWS rasterizer bug, we provided a modified font with smaller coordinates but larger diagonal entries in the FontMatrix.  This trick unfortunately doesn't work with Acrobat 4.
     
    > Some friends have suggested that the problems MAY be traceable to
    > subtle problems in the hinting of the Type I TeX fonts I obtained
    > with MikTeX.
     
    This is not the case.  The hinting (or lack thereof) has no effect. And the hinting in the AMS/BSR/Y&Y CM and AMS fonts is fine.
     
    > Louis Vosloo <help@YandY.com> wrote:
     
    > >> >Meantime you can check "Print page as image" in the print dialog to
    > >> >avoid this problem.
     
    --
    Y&Y, Inc. mailto:support@YandY.com    http://www.YandY.com

    Track this thread for me

    Subscribe to comp.text.pdf
    Mail this message to a friend
    View original Usenet format
    Create a custom link to this message from your own Web site

    << Previous in thread   ·   Next in thread >>

    Search Discussions
      For a more detailed search go to Search only in: comp.text.pdf
    All .com
    Search for: Search  Messages

     Arts & Entertainment   Automotive   Computing & Tech   Consumer Electronics   Health & Fitness 
     Home & Family   Lifestyles   Money   Politics & Media   Recreation   Sports   Travel 
    Holiday Shopping - FREE Internet Access - FREE STUFF! - Trade with Datek - GET IT NOW @ NECX - eBay Auctions - MAIL.COM - Get FREE Health Info@drkoop.com - BUY AT COST at eCOST.com - Search for Jobs! JobOptions - The BEST Music Online - Onsale Auctions

    Copyright © 1999 .com, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Trademarks · Terms & Conditions of Use · Site Privacy Statement.

    Advertise with Us!  |  About .com